DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

133481P.pdf   12/30/2014  United States  v.  Christopher Sean Daniels
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3481
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Defendant was coherent and 
   responsive when he made his post-Miranda statements and there was no 
   evidence that he was coerced or threatened; as a result, the statements 
   were admissible because he had voluntarily and knowingly waived his 
   rights; district court did not err in denying a motion to reopen the 
   suppression hearing based on the discovery of a video as the video 
   supported the court's earlier conclusions; no error in sentencing 
   defendant as an armed career criminal; sentence was not substantively 
   unreasonable.