DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
133645P.pdf 10/14/2015 Melvin Smith v. URS Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-3645
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Employment discrimination. In a Section 1981 disparate
treatment action based on allegedly discriminatory pay differentials
between plaintiff and a white co-worker, the district court erred in
granting the employer's motion for summary judgment as the evidence, taken
in the light most favorable to plaintiff, shows the employer hired the
white employee at a higher classification and pay even though there were
no meaningful distinctions in their qualifications or the work they
performed; the district court did not discuss the elements of plaintiff's
separate retaliation claim, and the denial of the claim is reversed so the
district court can develop the record on the claim and address in the
first instance the elements of the claim. Judge Shepherd, dissenting.