DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

133671P.pdf   02/06/2015  NanoMech, Inc.  v.  Arunya Suresh
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3671
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Bye and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Contracts. Plaintiffs' pleadings were closed at the time 
   defendant filed her motion to dismiss, and any error in the district 
   court's decision to convert defendant's motion to dismiss into a Rule 
   12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings was harmless; the district 
   court did not err in determining the non-compete provision in defendant's 
   employment contract, which prohibited her from working anywhere in any 
   capacity for any business which competed with plaintiff, was overbroad, 
   unreasonable and unenforceable.