136003P.pdf   08/01/2013  Charles W. Ries  v.  Michael Calandrillo
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-6003
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Nail, Author, with Federman, Chief Judge, and Saladino, 
   Bankruptcy Judge] 
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court did not err in allowing 
   trustee's amended complaint to relate back to the date of the original 
   complaint as the original complaint was timely and Calandrillo was aware 
   of the adversary proceeding; further, Calandrillo knew or should have 
   known that he would have been named as defendant but for a mistake as to 
   the proper party; $65,000 payment made to defendant's lawyers in trust for 
   plaintiff was not a contemporaneous exchange within the meaning of 11 
   U.S.C. Sec. 547(c)(1), or a payment made in the ordinary course of 
   business within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 547(c)(2)(A), and the court 
   did not err in ordering Calandrillo to return the funds to the trustee 
   under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 547(b).