141054P.pdf   03/23/2015  United States  v.  Jermaine Roy
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1054
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Wollman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. In this prosecution for sex trafficking, the 
   district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to permit 
   defendant to show a video of the victim performing a sex act on him; the 
   district court did not err under Fed. R. Evid. 412(a) in refusing to 
   permit defendant to introduce evidence of he victim's past sexual 
   behavior; nor did exclusion of the evidence violate defendant's Sixth 
   Amendment rights; in any event, defendant's failure to file a timely 
   notice under Rule 412(c)(1)(B) was sufficient grounds to deny the request; 
   claim of Brady violation rejected as defendant had access to the relevant 
   information, which was in a published Arkansas Supreme Court decision, and 
   the government was unaware of the fact that the victim had made a false 
   statement to state police in an unrelated case.