DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
141123P.pdf 03/31/2015 United States v. Randy Never Misses A Shot
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-1123
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Pierre
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Murphy and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal case. The district court's comments to the
prosecution at a sidebar regarding a possible deficiency in its evidence
and the court's decision to permit the government to reopen its
case-in-chief were not an abuse of the court' discretion and did not
prejudice defendant because the jury did not hear the comments and the
evidence at that point was, in any event, sufficient to convict defendant
on the count; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's convictions
for sexual abuse of a minor; the court did not err in rejecting
defendant's request for a lesser-included-offense of simple assault; no
error in admitting the testimony of six Rule 413 and 414 witnesses as the
court concluded the conduct covered by their testimony was similar enough
to the conduct charged to prove propensity; even if the admission of six
witnesses' testimony raised Rule 403 concerns, any error was harmless in
light of the other evidence of propensity; no error in excluding evidence
of past sexual assault against a victim under Rule 412.