141171P.pdf   07/29/2015  United States  v.  Jamie Jones
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1171
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Wollman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. While an on-the-record inquiry into 
   defendant's pre-trial motion for appointment of counsel would have aided 
   review, the magistrate judge did not err in denying the motion without an 
   inquiry as the motion described defendant's complaints in detail and did 
   not provide a basis for removing counsel and appointing a new lawyer; 
   Speedy Trial Act claim based on defendant's attorney's requests for 
   continuances was waived because defendant failed to assert his Speedy 
   Trial Act rights before trial; video of search contained relevant evidence 
   and the fact that it depicted possible other criminal activity did not 
   prejudice defendant in light of the court's directions to the jury and the 
   strength of the government's case in this felon-in-possession prosecution.