DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

141349P.pdf   08/13/2015  Cynthia Thomas  v.  Heartland Employment Services
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1349
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Employment discrimination. There was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether age was a contributing factor in plaintiff's discharge and the district court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's age claim under the Missouri Human Rights Act; a jury could reasonably infer that defendant Hagen was a decision-maker or closely involved in the decision to terminate plaintiff; Hagen's age-related comments were sufficiently related to plaintiff and to the decisional process to constitute direct evidence of discrimination; as a result, a reasonable jury could infer that Hagen affirmed and took part in the discharge decision, that he was motivated by age-based animus and that his bias was a contributing factor in the adverse employment action.