DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
141421P.pdf 11/26/2014 United States v. Adam Chartier
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-1421
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The police had an articulable and
objectively reasonable suspicion that a motorist without a valid license
was operating a vehicle, and the officer's decision to make a traffic stop
did not violate the Fourth Amendment; the officer had the necessary
suspicion to expand the scope and range of the stop once he saw muriatic
acid and tubing in the car, and the use of a drug dog was permissible; the
officer's knowledge of defendant's history and the facts of the stop
justified a pat-down search for purposes of officer safety; fact that the
officer could not find drugs in the car after the dog alerted justified a
search of defendant's person since those facts made it more likely that
any drugs that had been in the car were on defendant's person.