DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

141421P.pdf   11/26/2014  United States  v.  Adam Chartier
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1421
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. The police had an articulable and objectively reasonable suspicion that a motorist without a valid license was operating a vehicle, and the officer's decision to make a traffic stop did not violate the Fourth Amendment; the officer had the necessary suspicion to expand the scope and range of the stop once he saw muriatic acid and tubing in the car, and the use of a drug dog was permissible; the officer's knowledge of defendant's history and the facts of the stop justified a pat-down search for purposes of officer safety; fact that the officer could not find drugs in the car after the dog alerted justified a search of defendant's person since those facts made it more likely that any drugs that had been in the car were on defendant's person.