141560P.pdf   07/06/2015  David Meyer and Nancy Meyer  v.  U.S. Bank National Association
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1560
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Smith, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Torts. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Meyer 
   v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 715 F.3d 703 (8th Cir. 2013). In this action 
   alleging tortious interference with the plaintiff's contractual relations 
   with a feed supplier, the district court did not err in granting summary 
   judgment based on matters outside the pleadings where all parties were 
   given a change to present material pertinent to the motion; the district 
   court did not err in imposing Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiffs where 
   they repackaged the prior suit under a different cause of action and made 
   claims regarding the trust's status as plaintiff which were contradicted 
   by their contentions in the prior case and the evidence in the record; the 
   trust's appeal of the sanctions order was not frivolous; however, by 
   arguing that the district court erred in granting a Rule 12(b)(6) 
   dismissal when the district court clearly granted summary judgment in the 
   case, and by misrepresenting governing law in their reply brief, 
   plaintiffs had frivolously argued the appeal, and defendant is entitled to 
   double appeals costs as a sanction.