141635P.pdf   04/23/2015  Luther Stanley  v.  Cottrell Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1635
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Loken and Melloy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Torts. Plaintiff's proffered rebuttal testimony was 
   cumulative and the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing 
   to admit it; plaintiff did not preserve his challenge to defendant's 
   verdict director as he did not make a specific objection when the court 
   read the instruction at the instruction conference and did not object when 
   the instruction was read to the jury; since his claim of error was 
   forfeited, plaintiff must show an obvious error in the instruction and he 
   has failed to do so; based on the language in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1920(2) a 
   party may recover costs of both printed and electronically recorded 
   transcripts of the same deposition as long as each transcript is necessary 
   for use in the case; award of various costs affirmed.