141929P.pdf   03/30/2015  Streambend Properties II, LLC  v.  Ivy Tower Minneapolis, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-1929
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bye and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act. For the court's 
   prior opinion in the case see Streambend Props. II, LLC v. Ivy Tower 
   Mpls., LLC, 451 F. App'x 627 (8th Cir. 2012). District court did not abuse 
   its discretion by refusing to permit plaintiff to re-add a party whose 
   prior dismissal on the merits was not challenged in the earlier appeal; 
   plaintiff's Count alleging violation of Section 1703(a)(2)(A)&(C) did not 
   satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) because it failed to plead 
   intentional wrongdoing (scienter) and the district court did not err in 
   dismissing the Count; Rule 8 governed the Section 1703(a)(2)(B) 
   allegations in Count I of the complaint, and it was error to dismiss them 
   for failure to satisfy Rule 9; however, the Count failed to state a 
   plausible claim and the dismissal is affirmed; no error in refusing to 
   permit further amendment of the complaint; no error in granting defendant 
   Commonwealth's motion for summary judgment as there was no evidence it 
   made any representations or was involved in the sale of property to 
   plaintiff; the district court did not err in refusing to exercise 
   supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims.