DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

142156P.pdf   06/15/2016  State of North Dakota  v.  Beverly Heydinger
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-2156
                          and No:  14-2251
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Murphy and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Constitutional law. In action by out-of-state utilities to declare unconstitutional Sections 216H.03, subd. 3(2)and (3) of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act which ban importation of power that would increase statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions, the district court did not err in finding the utilities had standing to pursue the action and that the matter was ripe for review; nor did the court err in declining to abstain under the Pullman doctrine; the district court did not err in determining that the challenged prohibitions have the practical effect of controlling conduct beyond the boundaries of Minnesota; the law therefore has extraterritorial reach and will prevent utilities from adding capacity from prohibited sources anywhere on the grid, absent Minnesota regulatory approval or a dismantling of the federally encouraged and approved power network transmission system; Minnesota may not do this without approval of Congress, and the district court did not err in enjoining enforcement of the sections; plaintiffs' cross-appeal was mooted by the district court's entry of an order regarding attorney fees while the matter was pending on appeal. Judge Murphy, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.