DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
142156P.pdf 06/15/2016 State of North Dakota v. Beverly Heydinger
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-2156
and No: 14-2251
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Murphy and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Constitutional law. In action by out-of-state utilities to
declare unconstitutional Sections 216H.03, subd. 3(2)and (3) of the
Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act which ban importation of power that
would increase statewide power sector carbon dioxide emissions, the
district court did not err in finding the utilities had standing to pursue
the action and that the matter was ripe for review; nor did the court err
in declining to abstain under the Pullman doctrine; the district court did
not err in determining that the challenged prohibitions have the practical
effect of controlling conduct beyond the boundaries of Minnesota; the law
therefore has extraterritorial reach and will prevent utilities from
adding capacity from prohibited sources anywhere on the grid, absent
Minnesota regulatory approval or a dismantling of the federally encouraged
and approved power network transmission system; Minnesota may not do this
without approval of Congress, and the district court did not err in
enjoining enforcement of the sections; plaintiffs' cross-appeal was mooted
by the district court's entry of an order regarding attorney fees while
the matter was pending on appeal. Judge Murphy, concurring in part and
concurring in the judgment.