DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

142545P.pdf   02/24/2015  United States  v.  Miguel Soto
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-2545
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Rule 32(h) by its terms applies to departures 
   only, not to the original calculation of the Guidelines range, and the 
   court did not have to give defendant prior notice of its intent not to 
   apply the minor participant reduction as part of its calculation of the 
   advisory guidelines range; district court properly followed Rule 
   32(i)(1)(C) with respect to inviting defendant to comment on the minor 
   participant reduction,a downward departure for substantial assistance, and 
   the 3553(a) factors.