DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

142574P.pdf   05/05/2015  United States  v.  Terrence Mathews
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-2574
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Colloton, Circuit Judge, and White, 
   District Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal case and sentencing. Assuming without deciding 
   that the warrantless drug dog sniff outside the door to defendant's 
   apartment violated defendant's Fourth Amendment rights as construed in 
   Jardines, at the time the officers conducted the search, they reasonably 
   relied on binding circuit precedents sanctioning such sniffs, and the 
   exclusionary rule did not preclude the use of the evidence in a 
   search-warrant application; no error in imposing a two-level enhancement 
   under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(b)(4) for possession of a stolen firearm