142853P.pdf   07/13/2015  United States  v.  Daniel Lee
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-2853
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. For the court's prior opinion on Lee's habeas 
   petition, see U.S. v. Lee, 715 F.3d 215 (8th Cir 2013). The district court 
   did not err in denying Lee's Rule 60(b) motion for lack of 
   precertification by the Circuit Court since it was seeking to reopen a 
   claim which had been raised in his initial habeas petition and decided by 
   the district court; no evidentiary omission by counsel in Lee's first 
   Section 2255 petition amounted to a procedural defect in the integrity of 
   the habeas proceeding and any attempt to relitigate the merits denial of 
   the petition would count as a second or successive habeas subject to 
   AEDPA's precertification demands.