143104P.pdf   06/06/2016  Dimetrious Woods  v.  Jeff Norman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3104
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. The Missouri courts' determination that trial 
   counsel's decision not to call Woods' co-defendant to testify was not 
   ineffective assistance of counsel because Woods could not establish the 
   prejudice prong of Strickland in light of the evidence of his guilt was 
   not contrary to or an unreasonable interpretation of clearly established 
   federal law or based on an unreasonable interpretation of the evidence; 
   alleged imprecision in the language the Missouri Court of Appeals used in 
   evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence did not establish the court 
   acted contrary to Strickland as the court accurately cited the Strickland 
   test in other portions of the opinion; Court of Appeals application of the 
   prejudice prong was not unreasonable based on the record.