DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

143109P.pdf   08/14/2015  Sprint Communications Co.  v.  Elizabeth S. Jacobs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3109
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Smith and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Telecommunications Act of 1996. For the court's prior 
   opinion, see Sprint Communications Co. v. Jacobs, 690 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 
   2012), reversed in Sprint Communications Co. v. Jacobs, 134 S. Ct. 584 
   (2013). In light of this court's holding in Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. 
   Qwest Corp., 363 F.3d 683 (8th Cir. 2004),the court concludes that 
   Congress did not intend that issue-preclusion principles bar federal-court 
   review of the issue involved here: whether the nomadic intrastate 
   long-distance VoIP calls at issue are information services, payment for 
   which should be governed by a reciprocal compensation agreement, or 
   telecommunications services subject to state access charges; reversed and 
   remanded for further proceedings.