DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

143358P.pdf   06/13/2016  Thomas Ingrassia  v.  Carol Dicknette
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3358
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. In action by a civilly-committed person 
   alleging defendants had deprived him of his constitutional right to 
   adequate nutrition, the evidence, taken most favorably to plaintiff 
   demonstrated a violation of his constitutional right to adequate nutrition 
   and the district court did not err in denying defendants' motion for 
   summary judgment based on qualified immunity; however, two of the 
   defendants did not have knowledge of plaintiff's weight loss and the court 
   erred in denying them summary judgment on plaintiff's claim for deliberate 
   indifference; plaintiff's right to adequate nutrition was clearly 
   established.