143415P.pdf   04/19/2016  Eric Wong  v.  Minnesota DHS
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3415
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. Because Wong served the defendants with a 
   notice of appeal less than 30 days after the Commissioner of the Minnesota 
   Department of Human Services entered an order on his benefits application, 
   and because no undue delay accompanied his initial filing with the 
   district court, the appeal was timely, and the district court erred in 
   dismissing his appeal on this basis; Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not apply 
   and did not bar review of the state agency decision; Minn. Rev. Stat. 
   Section 256.045 which contemplated only state court review of the benefits 
   decision did not bar the federal courts from exercising supplemental 
   jurisdiction over the matter; the district court's decision dismissing the 
   supplemental state-law claim is vacated and the matter is remanded for 
   further consideration; because the state agency's decision on benefits was 
   not final, the district court erred in finding Wong's ADA and 
   Rehabilitation Act claims were precluded; Wong's complaint failed to state 
   a claim for violation of his due process rights as the state's procedures 
   for review satisfied the minimum requirements of the Due Process Clause; 
   since Wong's equal protection claim under Section 1983 is predicated on 
   the same facts as his ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims, the district 
   court did not err in dismissing the Section 1983 claim on the ground that 
   those statutes provided a comprehensive enforcement mechanism. Judge Beam, 
   concurring in part and dissenting in part.