143446P.pdf   02/18/2016  Arlena Kelly  v.  City of Omaha
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3446
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiff's sexual harassment allegations 
   against defendant Petersen, a city employee,failed to state a claim for 
   municipal liability under Section 1983 because she did not plead facts 
   showing that his harassment represented part of a municipal policy or 
   custom supporting such behavior; the claims against defendant Denker and 
   unnamed Doe defendants contained no facts showing they violated her 
   constitutional rights, and the court would not reach the question of 
   whether Denker, as chief code inspector was a policymaking official; no 
   error in dismissing plaintiff's Section 1985 claim as she failed to show 
   that any harassment or subsequent retaliation arose from an agreement 
   between Petersen and Denker or other city officials; even if the court 
   were to infer that Denker and the unidentified officials did reach an 
   agreement, the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine precluded the claim, as 
   the city could not conspire with itself through its agents acting within 
   the scope of their employment.