DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
143517P.pdf 03/17/2016 United States v. Veronica Fairchild
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 14-3517
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to
support the jury's finding that defendant knowingly and willfully
underreported her income as an exotic dancer; jury instructions correctly
stated the elements of the offense and it was not necessary for the
instructions to require the jury to decide unanimously the source of the
unreported income as that was not an essential element of the crime;
further, the court gave a limiting instruction requiring the jury to
unanimously agree on whether the false matter alleged in the indictment
and proven at trial was regarding defendant's income, tax liability or
both; the district court did not err in calculating the tax loss in
setting defendant's offense level; the court did not err in imposing a
two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2T1.1(b)(1)(2014 for failing
to report income from criminal activity as the evidence was sufficient to
support the court's determination that the money defendant earned was in
exchange for sex; the defendant's sentence was not substantively
unreasonable, as the court considered her arguments for a lower sentence
based on factors such as her personal history and family situation and
acted within its discretion in giving greater weight to the seriousness of
her conduct and her failure to accept responsibility and reform her
conduct.