DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

143517P.pdf   03/17/2016  United States  v.  Veronica Fairchild
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3517
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding that defendant knowingly and willfully underreported her income as an exotic dancer; jury instructions correctly stated the elements of the offense and it was not necessary for the instructions to require the jury to decide unanimously the source of the unreported income as that was not an essential element of the crime; further, the court gave a limiting instruction requiring the jury to unanimously agree on whether the false matter alleged in the indictment and proven at trial was regarding defendant's income, tax liability or both; the district court did not err in calculating the tax loss in setting defendant's offense level; the court did not err in imposing a two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2T1.1(b)(1)(2014 for failing to report income from criminal activity as the evidence was sufficient to support the court's determination that the money defendant earned was in exchange for sex; the defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as the court considered her arguments for a lower sentence based on factors such as her personal history and family situation and acted within its discretion in giving greater weight to the seriousness of her conduct and her failure to accept responsibility and reform her conduct.