143623P.pdf   01/29/2016  Sriram Rajasekaran  v.  Mark Hazuda
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3623
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Immigration. The district court did not err in determining it 
   lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to consider procedural challenges to 
   the revocation of plaintiff's I-140 petition; plaintiff could not port his 
   I-140 because it was not valid to begin with, and he was not statutorily 
   eligible to adjust his status. 
  
143623P.pdf   12/01/2015  Sriram Rajasekaran  v.  Mark Hazuda
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3623
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Immigration. The district court did not have jurisdiction to 
   review the claim that the USCIS did not comply with the disclosure 
   requirements in 8 C.F.R. Sec. 103.2(b)(16); plaintiff could not port his 
   I-140 to subsequent employers because the I-140 was not valid to begin 
   with as the USCIS found numerous deficiencies in the petition submitted by 
   the original employer.