DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

143658P.pdf   03/04/2016  David Stults  v.  International Flavors, etc
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-3658
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Smith and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. In an action alleging plaintiff contracted the lung disease bronchiolitis obliterans as a result of his inhalation of the chemical diacetyl through his daily consumption of butter flavor popcorn, the district court did not err in denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial after the jury returned a verdict for the manufacturer; the district court's curative instruction after it struck the testimony of one of defendant's experts was not objected to, and plaintiffs failed to show, in the absence of an objection, that the instruction was plain error; the district court did not err in denying the plaintiffs' request for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the jury considered the stricken testimony; the district court did not plainly error in striking only a portion of another defense witness's testimony as, again, plaintiffs failed to object to the court's ruling and the court gave a thorough and prompt curative instruction; plaintiffs failed to show the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence; no error in denying plaintiffs' motion for judgment as a matter of law.