DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

146013P.pdf   10/17/2014  Stephen Carlson, I  v.  U.S. Bank, N.A.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  14-6013
                          and No:  14-6024
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Saladino and Shodeen, Circuit Judges] 
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The court is unable to review the pro se 
   debtors issues as they have failed to provide transcripts of the relevant 
   hearings as required by Bankruptcy Rules 8006 and 8009(b); to the extent 
   the court can consider debtors legal issues without having been provided 
   with their factual basis, none of the legal arguments have merit, and the 
   bankruptcy court's orders are affirmed.