DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151074P.pdf   04/07/2016  Thomas E. Perez  v.  Contingent Care, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1074
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Labor law - Fair Labor Standards Act. The district court did not err in 
   determining Endless Possibilities and Contingent Care, which provide 
   custodial care and educational services to young children, qualified as a 
   preschool and was a covered enterprise under section 203(s)(1)(B). Any 
   claim that their employees were exempt teachers was waived. The district 
   court did not err in calculating damages for violations of the Fair Labor 
   Standards Act, as the court did not err in relying on the Secretary's 
   calculations, did not err in finding employer's records inadequate or 
   inaccurate, and made just and reasonable inferences to determine wages 
   owed.