151076P.pdf   09/07/2017  UnitedHealth Group Inc.  v.  Executive Risk Specialty Ins.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1076
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Insurance. In action seeking indemnity and defense costs for 
   underlying litigation settlements under professional liability excess 
   insurance policies issued by UnitedHealth, the district court did not err 
   in granting the defendant insurance companies' motion for summary judgment 
   on the ground that UnitedHealth did not present sufficient evidence on how 
   a settlement was allocated between covered and non-covered claims; under 
   Minnesota law, it is not enough for UnitedHealth to simply show that the 
   entire $350 million settlement included a covered claim of an unspecified 
   amount; UnitedHealth bears the burden to allocate the settlement between 
   the potentially covered suit and the non-covered suit with enough 
   specificity to permit a reasoned judgment about liability; UnitedHealth 
   waived its objection to the court's order on defense costs.