DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151415P.pdf   04/25/2016  Cynthia Wilson  v.  Jayne Miller
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1415
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Smith, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging defendants retaliated against plaintiff, their employee, for her public comments in a newspaper article and at an open meeting for employees by giving her a negative performance rating, ratings that have a negative impact on promotion potential do not constitute an adverse employment action unless the rating actually led to the denial of a promotion, and the evidence here did not support a conclusion that plaintiff would have been selected absent the comments in her performance review; further, plaintiff had not presented evidence that the review was actually used in the selection process and no reasonable jury could draw an inference that the employer did not promote plaintiff because of comments in her performance evaluation; similarly, there was no evidence that plaintiff's protected speech was a substantial or motivating factor in other claimed adverse actions - denial of a promotion and disciplinary actions; the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's pendent state law claims. Judge Smith, dissenting.