DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151415P.pdf 04/25/2016 Cynthia Wilson v. Jayne Miller
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-1415
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Smith, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging defendants retaliated
against plaintiff, their employee, for her public comments in a newspaper
article and at an open meeting for employees by giving her a negative
performance rating, ratings that have a negative impact on promotion
potential do not constitute an adverse employment action unless the rating
actually led to the denial of a promotion, and the evidence here did not
support a conclusion that plaintiff would have been selected absent the
comments in her performance review; further, plaintiff had not presented
evidence that the review was actually used in the selection process and no
reasonable jury could draw an inference that the employer did not promote
plaintiff because of comments in her performance evaluation; similarly,
there was no evidence that plaintiff's protected speech was a substantial
or motivating factor in other claimed adverse actions - denial of a
promotion and disciplinary actions; the district court did not abuse its
discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
plaintiff's pendent state law claims. Judge Smith, dissenting.