DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151540P.pdf 07/20/2016 Tamela Montgomery v. City of Ames
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-1540
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Civil rights. For the court's prior opinion in the matter,
see Montgomery v. City of Ames, 749 F.3d 689 (8th Cir. 2014). In an action
brought by a woman assaulted by a man residing in a halfway house operated
by the State of Iowa in Ames, the district court did not err in granting
summary judgment for the State, the center, the center's manager and the
director of the Iowa Department of Corrections, as: (1) there was no
evidence the center's manager had any knowledge of the man's actions in
abusing plaintiff or violating protective orders, and he cannot be held
liable under Section 1983 for constitutional violations of a subordinate
on a respondeat superior theory; (2) there was insufficient evidence that
his subordinates were deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious
substantial risk of harm to plaintiff when they authorized the assailant
to visit a local grocery store (he instead went to plaintiff's home and
committed the assault); (3) plaintiff failed to establish that the manager
or the employees of the center created a new danger to plaintiff or
increased the danger the man posed to her; (4) the claim against the
Director of the Department of Corrections failed for insufficient evidence
as he had no personal knowledge of the situation and he cannot be held
liable for failure to train or implement adequate policies in the absence
of a constitutional violation by the staff; and (5) the claims against the
State and the Center are barred by the Eleventh Amendment.