151586P.pdf   04/28/2016  United States  v.  Jerry Golliher
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1586
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Bye and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Claim of ineffective assistance of counsel 
   was not developed and would not be considered on direct appeal; defendant 
   failed to comply with the requirements of FRAP 28(a)(8)(A) with respect to 
   his claim that the district court erred in excluding certain emails by 
   failing to supply any citation to the record to show that the emails were 
   more probative than other evidence under the third prong of Rule 807, and 
   the court would not reverse on this issue; the district court did not 
   clearly err in answering the jury's question concerning the victim's age; 
   claims of prosecutorial misconduct (misstatements of law and improper 
   vouching) during closing argument rejected.