DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151613P.pdf   08/02/2016  United States  v.  Robert Boedigheimer
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1613
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Colloton, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's motion for new trial based on an unfinished question the 
   prosecutor attempted to ask him during his cross-examination; the question 
   was neither finished nor answered and the court gave a curative 
   instruction; the court did not err in considering the fact that defendant 
   abused the trust of his client in refusing to set a shorter sentence, and 
   defendant's below-guidelines sentence is affirmed.