DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151676P.pdf 07/05/2016 United States v. Warnell Reid
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-1676
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion in the matter,
see United States v. Reid,769 F.3d 990 (8th Cir. 2014). On remand, the
district court did not err in allowing the government to add evidence to
the sentencing record, as the court's opinion did not address the issues
raised on remand or limit the scope of the proceeding; no error in
applying an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(a)(3) regarding
weapons capable of accepting high capacity magazines; the enhancement did
not have to be pleaded in the indictment under Alleyne; no error in
imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 for obstruction of
justice based on the court's finding defendant perjured himself; term of
imprisonment imposed in 1998 as a consecutive sentence was properly
counted for purposes of computing defendant's criminal history; while the
judge who sentenced defendant in this matter had been the sentencing judge
in one of defendant's state court convictions, the court relied on
certified records to resolve a factual matter,rather than any personal
knowledge or information not available to defendant and there was no
violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32; sentence was not substantively
unreasonable.