DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151676P.pdf   07/05/2016  United States  v.  Warnell Reid
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1676
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see United States v. Reid,769 F.3d 990 (8th Cir. 2014). On remand, the district court did not err in allowing the government to add evidence to the sentencing record, as the court's opinion did not address the issues raised on remand or limit the scope of the proceeding; no error in applying an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(a)(3) regarding weapons capable of accepting high capacity magazines; the enhancement did not have to be pleaded in the indictment under Alleyne; no error in imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice based on the court's finding defendant perjured himself; term of imprisonment imposed in 1998 as a consecutive sentence was properly counted for purposes of computing defendant's criminal history; while the judge who sentenced defendant in this matter had been the sentencing judge in one of defendant's state court convictions, the court relied on certified records to resolve a factual matter,rather than any personal knowledge or information not available to defendant and there was no violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32; sentence was not substantively unreasonable.