151682P.pdf   08/03/2018  Minnesota Voters Alliance  v.  Joe Mansky
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1682
                          and No:  15-1741
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Riley, Chief Judge, Loken and Benton, 
   Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Election laws. Judges Loken and Benton issue this decision 
   pursuant to 8th Cir. R. 47E. For the court's prior opinions in the matter, 
   see Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 2013) and 
   Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 849 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2017). On remand from 
   the Supreme Court. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 138 S.Ct. 1876 
   (2018). In light of the Supreme Court' decision that the Minnesota statute 
   in question violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, this 
   court reverses the grant of summary judgment for the defendants and 
   remands the matter for further proceedings. 
  
151682P.pdf   02/28/2017  Minnesota Voters Alliance  v.  Joe Mansky
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1682
                          and No:  15-1741
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil case - Minnesota Election Laws. Several organizations and 
   individuals challenge Minnesota Statute Section 211B.11 which prohibits 
   the wearing of political insignia at a polling place. For the court's 
   earlier opinion reversing dismissal of the groups' as-applied First 
   Amendment claim, see Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051 (8th Cir. 
   2013). The statute and the state's policy implementing it are viewpoint 
   neutral and facially reasonable,and application of the policy to persons 
   wearing Tea Party apparel was reasonable because the Tea party has 
   recognizable political views; defendants' summary judgment on plaintiffs' 
   First Amendment claims is affirmed.