DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151869P.pdf   07/22/2016  John Cottrell  v.  Michael Duke
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1869
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana   
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Shareholders' Actions. In action by shareholders of Wal-Mart against the directors and officers of the corporation accusing them of breaking state and federal law by permitting and covering-up bribery committed by Wal-Mart's Mexican subsidiary, the specific facts alleged in the complaint do not give rise to a reasonable inference that Wal-Mart's board of directors learned of the suspected bribery while the alleged bribery was being covered-up and an internal investigation quashed; the allegations did not, therefore, establish "with particularity" that the threat of personal liability rendered a majority of the Wal-Mart board incapable of fairly considering whether to pursue the corporate causes of action the shareholders seek to enforce in this case, as required by Rule 23.1 and Delaware's heightened pleading threshold for derivative suits; as a result, the plaintiffs could not bring this action, and the dismissal of the shareholders' suit is affirmed.