DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151869P.pdf 07/22/2016 John Cottrell v. Michael Duke
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-1869
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Shareholders' Actions. In action by shareholders of Wal-Mart
against the directors and officers of the corporation accusing them of
breaking state and federal law by permitting and covering-up bribery
committed by Wal-Mart's Mexican subsidiary, the specific facts alleged in
the complaint do not give rise to a reasonable inference that Wal-Mart's
board of directors learned of the suspected bribery while the alleged
bribery was being covered-up and an internal investigation quashed; the
allegations did not, therefore, establish "with particularity" that the
threat of personal liability rendered a majority of the Wal-Mart board
incapable of fairly considering whether to pursue the corporate causes of
action the shareholders seek to enforce in this case, as required by Rule
23.1 and Delaware's heightened pleading threshold for derivative suits; as
a result, the plaintiffs could not bring this action, and the dismissal of
the shareholders' suit is affirmed.