151904P.pdf   03/08/2016  United States  v.  Buck Otto White
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1904
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. District court did not abuse its 
   discretion in admitting other crimes evidence showing that White possessed 
   other stolen items in his storage unit and car, as the admission met the 
   requirements under Rule 404(b). The evidence was probative of a material 
   issue other than character, the evidence was similar in kind and not 
   overly remote in time, sufficient evidence was presented to support that 
   the prior acts had occurred, and resulting prejudice did not outweigh 
   probative value. One-week notice of intent to introduce the evidence of 
   other stolen items found in White?s storage unit was reasonable under 
   the circumstances. Sufficient evidence was presented from which jury could 
   concluded that White knowingly possessed firearms and ammunition, as he 
   had control over the storage unit and knowledge of its contents and 
   ammunition was found in his home, and that he knew or had reasonable cause 
   to believe they were stolen. District court did not clearly err in finding 
   evidence supported enhancement under USSG sec. 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). Sentence, 
   in which district court varied downward, was not substantively 
   unreasonable and district court did not abuse its discretion.