DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

151916P.pdf   09/13/2016  Ruben Cambara-Cambara  v.  Loretta E. Lynch
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1916
                          and No:  15-1917
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Chief Judge Riley and Shepherd, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Petition for Review - immigration. As to untimely asylum application, the 
   court does not have jurisdiction to review a determination that an 
   application for asylum as untimely or qualifies for changed circumstances, 
   as petitioners did not make constitutional claim or raise a question of 
   law. On withholding of removal claim, brothers did not show criminal gangs 
   targeted members of their family because of family relationships as 
   opposed to being prosperous businessmen who are targets for extortionate 
   demands. Substantial evidence supports that gangs did not act with consent 
   or acquiescence of a public official to support CAT relief. Petitions for 
   review are denied.