DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152125P.pdf   08/12/2016  United States  v.  Bryan Binkholder
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2125
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Bright and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's appeal waiver did not preclude the appeal as he was sentenced using a higher total offense level than was contemplated in the agreement; the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction based on his post-plea misconduct; while this court's writ required the district court to recognize a particular person as a victim under the Crime Victim's' Rights Act, the writ did not require the district court to find the person as a victim for purposes of the Guidelines; the court cannot, on this record, find that the district court properly determined whether the person was a victim under Guidelines Sec. 2B1.1 such that the person's losses should increase defendant's offense level; on remand, the court should determine the person was a victim under the Guidelines and, if necessary, resentence defendant; district court correctly calculated restitution; claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would not be considered on direct appeal. Judge Gruender, concurring in part and dissenting in part.