DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
152125P.pdf 08/12/2016 United States v. Bryan Binkholder
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-2125
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Bright and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's appeal waiver did not preclude the
appeal as he was sentenced using a higher total offense level than was
contemplated in the agreement; the district court did not abuse its
discretion by denying defendant an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction
based on his post-plea misconduct; while this court's writ required the
district court to recognize a particular person as a victim under the
Crime Victim's' Rights Act, the writ did not require the district court to
find the person as a victim for purposes of the Guidelines; the court
cannot, on this record, find that the district court properly determined
whether the person was a victim under Guidelines Sec. 2B1.1 such that the
person's losses should increase defendant's offense level; on remand, the
court should determine the person was a victim under the Guidelines and,
if necessary, resentence defendant; district court correctly calculated
restitution; claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would not be
considered on direct appeal. Judge Gruender, concurring in part and
dissenting in part.