DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
152239P.pdf 12/09/2016 United States v. Luis Olivares
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-2239
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Colloton, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Claims that the district
court denied defendant access to discovery and that the government
improperly selectively preserved evidence by saving only inculpatory
materials rejected; the district court carefully protected defendant's
right to access adequate resources, including discovery files, exhibits
and the Internet, to prepare his own defense; defendant failed to preserve
his Youngblood argument concerning preservation of materials by failing to
raise the issue in the district court and by failing to present any
evidence of bad faith; the district court did not err by failing to sua
sponte order a reevaluation of defendant's competency to proceed as there
was no discernible difference in defendant's behavior or mental state
between the court's finding of competency and the start of the trial eight
months later; the court did not abuse its discretion by not ordering
another competency evaluation or hearing when defendant sought to
represent himself at trial and did not violate his Sixth Amendment by
permitting him to proceed pro se with standby counsel; Section 851 notice
was timely and there was no evidence that the government acted in bad
faith with respect to its decision as to when the file the notice; there
was no evidence defendant was incompetent during the five-year period for
challenging the convictions used to support the Section 851 notice.