DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152239P.pdf   12/09/2016  United States  v.  Luis Olivares
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2239
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Colloton, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Claims that the district court denied defendant access to discovery and that the government improperly selectively preserved evidence by saving only inculpatory materials rejected; the district court carefully protected defendant's right to access adequate resources, including discovery files, exhibits and the Internet, to prepare his own defense; defendant failed to preserve his Youngblood argument concerning preservation of materials by failing to raise the issue in the district court and by failing to present any evidence of bad faith; the district court did not err by failing to sua sponte order a reevaluation of defendant's competency to proceed as there was no discernible difference in defendant's behavior or mental state between the court's finding of competency and the start of the trial eight months later; the court did not abuse its discretion by not ordering another competency evaluation or hearing when defendant sought to represent himself at trial and did not violate his Sixth Amendment by permitting him to proceed pro se with standby counsel; Section 851 notice was timely and there was no evidence that the government acted in bad faith with respect to its decision as to when the file the notice; there was no evidence defendant was incompetent during the five-year period for challenging the convictions used to support the Section 851 notice.