152399P.pdf   02/03/2017  United States  v.  Jonathon Lamb
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2399
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Wollman and Bright, Circuit Judges - 
   please note this opinion is being filed by Judges Wollman and Loken 
   pursuant to 8th Cir. Rule 47E following the death of Judge Bright] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. On remand from the Supreme Court for further 
   consideration in light of Mathis v. United States , 136 S. Ct. 2243 
   (2016). For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see U.S. v. Mathis, 
   786 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir. 2015). The Supreme Court's decision in Mathis, 
   which did not address the ACCA's force clause, does not alter the court's 
   prior opinion that defendant's Michigan robbery convictions were ACCA 
   violent felonies, and that portion of the court's prior opinion is 
   reinstated; nor does Mathis alter the court's conclusion that the state 
   court charging document established that defendant's prior Wisconsin 
   burglary conviction was for the crime of generic burglary, an enumerated 
   felony in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii); as a result, defendant was 
   properly sentenced under the ACCA, and his sentence is affirmed. 
  
152399U.pdf   04/05/2016  United States  v.  Jonathon Lamb
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2399
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bright and Wollman, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in concluding 
   defendant's two prior Michigan unarmed robbery convictions and a prior 
   Wisconsin burglary conviction were violent felonies as that term is 
   defined in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(e)(2)(B), or in sentencing defendant to the 
   mandatory minimum sentence.