152482P.pdf   06/30/2016  Patrick A. Dadd  v.  Anoka County
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2482
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Beam and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. In this action alleging the county 
   and its jailers and jail medical staff were deliberately indifferent to 
   plaintiff's medical needs, the district court did not err in denying 
   defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of 
   qualified immunity as plaintiff showed he was suffering from a serious 
   dental problem and that the defendants were aware of his condition and 
   deliberately refused to provide him with pain medication which had been 
   prescribed for him and brought to the jail at the time of his arrest; 
   defendant had fair warning about the unconstitutionality of a failure to 
   provide pain medication for prisoners with serious dental conditions; 
   defendants' appeal was not frivolous and damages for a frivolous appeal 
   would not be awarded.