152657P.pdf   08/01/2016  Timothy Olmsted  v.  Saint Paul Public Schools
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2657
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Colloton, Circuit Judge, and Erickson, 
   District Judge] 
   Civil case - Contracts. Defendant was not entitled to rescind his 
   resignation as he failed to show duress under Minnesota law; no evidence 
   supported his allegations that the School District made an unlawful threat 
   against him or that his will was overcome; even if an unlawful threat was 
   made, the threat was cured as he had full knowledge of all of the facts, 
   advice from an attorney and ample time for reflections - see St. Louis 
   park Inv. Co. v. R.L. Johnson Inv. Co., 411 N.W.2d 288 (Minn. Ct. App. 
   1987); there was no evidence that the School District made material 
   misrepresentations regarding the investigation it was conducting regarding 
   allegations of plaintiff's misconduct.