152690P.pdf   08/31/2016  Riceland Foods  v.  Bayer Cropscience US
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2690
                          and No:  15-2693
                          and No:  15-2850
                          and No:  15-2893
                          and No:  15-3245
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Shepherd, Circuit Judge, and Bough, 
   District Judge] 
   Civil case - Class Actions. For the court's prior opinion in the matter 
   see In re Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, 764 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 
   2014). While the court held in the prior opinion that the district court 
   properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to apply its Common-Benefit 
   Order to state-court only plaintiffs, that case does not control here, 
   because both Riceland and Bayer were parties to multiple federal lawsuits 
   before the district court at the time of settlement, and the court had 
   jurisdiction to enter orders regarding Riceland's settlement of its claims 
   against Bayer; the district court did not abuse its discretion in the 
   amount of the allocation it ordered paid into the Common-Benefit Fund from 
   the Riceland-Bayer settlement; the court did not err in assigning to Bayer 
   the duty of causing a deposit of the funds due under the Common-Benefit 
   Order.