DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152777P.pdf   09/22/2016  James Kuntz  v.  Rodenburg LLP
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2777
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. The district court did not err in dismissing this action based on the defendant's actions in attempting to contact a debtor, plaintiff's daughter, by calling his residence; defendant reasonably believed that plaintiff had not provided a complete response in his communication back to defendant, and it was reasonable for defendant to believe plaintiff had or could obtain location information about his daughter, thereby permitting a follow-up call to learn if plaintiff had obtained or was willing to provide the information; defendant's conduct did not rise to the level of harassment as a matter of law, and the court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment on plaintiff's Section 1692d(5) claim.