152781P.pdf   12/01/2016  Sarah Brooks  v.  City of Des Moines
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2781
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Automated Traffic Enforcement Systems. The driver-plaintiffs 
   all received a notice of a traffic violation and this established injury 
   in fact for standing purposes; since concurrent jurisdiction for municipal 
   infractions is not irreconcilable with Iowa state law, the drivers failed 
   to state a claim for violation of Iowa Code Section 602.6101; claim that 
   the ordinance improperly delegates powers is rejected on the basis of 
   Section V of this court's opinion in No. 15-2703 Hughes v. City of Cedar 
   Rapids (8th Cir. 2016); a provision for an optional administrative hearing 
   - itself appealable de novo to the state district court - is not 
   irreconcilable with Iowa Code Section 364.22(6); claims the system 
   violates federal civil rights dismissed pursuant to Section III.B and Part 
   IV of Hughes; claim the City's violation of IDOT rules states a claim 
   under the Iowa Constitution should be dismissed without prejudice under 
   Section IV.C of Hughes; claim of unjust enrichment dismissed under Part V 
   of Hughes. 
  
152781P.pdf   11/02/2016  Sarah Brooks  v.  City of Des Moines
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2781
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - Traffic cameras. Please see the related case of Hughes v. 
   City of Cedar Rapids, No. 15-2703, decided this date. The drivers' state 
   law claims based on Iowa Department of Transportation standards are 
   remanded for dismissal without prejudice; in all other respects, the 
   court's judgment is affirmed.