DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152789P.pdf   06/23/2017  Morgan Larson  v.  Ferrellgas Partners
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2789
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, for the Court En Banc] Civil case - Sherman Act. For the panel opinion in the matter, see In re Pre-Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litig., 834 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2016). In this action by a group of direct purchasers who bought propane tanks from defendants for resale, alleging defendants conspired to reduce the amount of propane in the tanks while maintaining the price in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the district court erred in dismissing the claims as barred by the statute of limitations; under applicable law, each sale to the plaintiffs in a price-fixing conspiracy starts the statutory period running again, and plaintiffs' allegations of a price-fixing conspiracy were sufficient to plead a continuing violation which restarted the statute of limitations. Judge Shepherd, dissenting, joined by Judge Wollman and Judge Loken; Judge Kelly joins portions of the dissent. 152789P.pdf 08/25/2016 Morgan Larson v. Ferrellgas Partners U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-2789 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Antitrust. In action alleging defendants had acted in concert to reduce the amount of propane placed in pre-filled propane exchange tanks while maintaining the same price per tank, thus artificially increasing the price of the tanks, the district court did not err in finding plaintiffs' claims are barred by the four-year statute of limitations provision in the Sherman Act. Judge Benton, dissenting.