DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
152789P.pdf 06/23/2017 Morgan Larson v. Ferrellgas Partners
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-2789
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, for the Court En Banc]
Civil case - Sherman Act. For the panel opinion in the matter, see In re
Pre-Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litig., 834 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2016). In
this action by a group of direct purchasers who bought propane tanks from
defendants for resale, alleging defendants conspired to reduce the amount
of propane in the tanks while maintaining the price in violation of
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the district court erred in dismissing the
claims as barred by the statute of limitations; under applicable law, each
sale to the plaintiffs in a price-fixing conspiracy starts the statutory
period running again, and plaintiffs' allegations of a price-fixing
conspiracy were sufficient to plead a continuing violation which restarted
the statute of limitations. Judge Shepherd, dissenting, joined by Judge
Wollman and Judge Loken; Judge Kelly joins portions of the dissent.
152789P.pdf 08/25/2016 Morgan Larson v. Ferrellgas Partners
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-2789
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Antitrust. In action alleging defendants had acted in concert
to reduce the amount of propane placed in pre-filled propane exchange
tanks while maintaining the same price per tank, thus artificially
increasing the price of the tanks, the district court did not err in
finding plaintiffs' claims are barred by the four-year statute of
limitations provision in the Sherman Act. Judge Benton, dissenting.