DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152814P.pdf   08/05/2016  John Finstad  v.  Beresford Bancorporation, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2814
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Circuit Judge and Gritzner, District Judge] Civil Case - diversity. District court's properly dismissed action for breach of contract, conversion, interference with contract and tort against Beresford Bancorporation based on doctrine of claim preclusion under North Dakota law, as prior state court action was a decision on the merits, involved the same parties, and the federal claims could have been raised in the state court action. The district court also properly granted summary judgment to the Gords based on issue preclusion, as the state court decision was on the merits and the state court decided that the Finstads did not have an interest in the property and thus could not relitigate that issue in federal court.