DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

152937P.pdf   06/15/2017  Douglas Sellner  v.  MAT Holdings, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2937
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Wollman and Riley, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Minnesota Whistleblower Act. Supervisor's comment that 
   plaintiff would be "on the street" if he did not "get creative with 
   [his]documentation" concerning a potentially defective product provided a 
   specific link between plaintiff's protected conduct and his termination; 
   the comment was sufficient to support a finding by a reasonable fact 
   finder that an illegitimate criterion actually motivated the adverse 
   employment action, and the district court erred in granting the employer 
   summary judgment on plaintiff's Whistleblower Act claim.