153441P.pdf   07/22/2016  United States  v.  Alejandro Manuel Torres-Ojeda
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3441
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant did not object to the adequacy of 
   the court's explanation of its sentencing decision and his claim that the 
   court committed procedural error by failing to provide an adequate 
   explanation of why time served was not a sufficient sentence is reviewed 
   for plain error; a court need not respond to every argument presented at 
   sentencing, and the record the court created in this sentencing was 
   sufficient to show the court had considered the defendant's arguments and 
   had a reasoned basis for its decision; below-guidelines sentence was 
   substantively reasonable.