153461P.pdf   08/05/2016  United States  v.  Darrell Scott
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3461
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Gruender, Circuit Judge, and Ketchmark, 
   District Judge] 
   Criminal Case - conviction and sentence. In challenge to the sufficiency 
   of the evidence of carjacking offense, evidence rationally supports 
   finding that Scott was accomplice, the identification evidence from the 
   photographic lineup did not violate due process, and his Sixth Amendment 
   rights were not violated by questions by law enforcement officials for 
   uncharged conduct. Based on the mandatory sentences to be served 
   consecutively for violation of section 924(c) convictions, and the two 
   armed carjackings which placed three individuals in fear of their lives, 
   the 768-month sentence does not violate the Eighth Amendment. The portion 
   of sentences mandated by section 924(c) is not subject to reasonableness 
   review. Scott has not demonstrated the district court abused its 
   discretion.