DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

153532P.pdf   02/27/2017  Kelly Heim  v.  BNSF Railway Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3532
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Federal Railroad Safety Act. The district court correctly 
   determined that plaintiff must show intentional retaliation in order to 
   prevail on his claim that his discipline violated the employee-protections 
   provisions of the Act, and it did not err in granting defendant's motion 
   for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff had failed to produce 
   sufficient evidence of intentional retaliation. See Kuduk v. BNSF Railway 
   Co., 768 F.3d 786 (8th Cir. 2014).